Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/11004
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGenadieva-Dimitrova Men_US
dc.contributor.authorSerafimoski Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorPopova Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorJoksimovic Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrajkovska Men_US
dc.contributor.authorCaloska Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorTodorovska Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorAndreevski Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorStardelova Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorIsahi Uen_US
dc.contributor.authorCurakova Een_US
dc.contributor.authorStavric Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamadani Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorJanevska Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-16T12:27:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-16T12:27:48Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/11004-
dc.description.abstractAIM: Analysis of the type of vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with various Doppler techniques and evaluation of the possibility of differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma in relation to the vascular pattern from other focal liver lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standard and contrast enhanced color and power Doppler using contrast medium Levovist was performed in 34 cases of subsequently histopathologically proven hepatocellular carcinoma. The type of vascular pattern was assessed according to the classification of Tanaka and Kubbota. Doppler characteristics of different Doppler methods aimed to allow sonographic diagnosis in different liver lesions. RESULTS: Highly significant difference (p <0.01) was established in vascular patterns between Doppler methods in the analysis of HCC lesions. Power Doppler and contrast-enhanced Doppler methods were superior to color Doppler in detection of the vascular pattern in HCC. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler was superior to standard. With standard and contrast-enhanced Doppler analysis of HCC lesions dominating vascular patterns were: basket pattern (BP), vessel in tumor (VT) and BP + VT. Crostabulation with Wilcoxon test showd highly statistically significant differences (p <0.01) in the sonographically diagnosed HCC lesions between standard and contrast-enhanced color and power Doppler. The difference between sonographical diagnoses in contrast-enhanced color and power Doppler was statistically significant (p <0.05), while in the other comparisons between different methods the difference was not statistically significant (p> 0.05). CONCLUSION: Doppler methods (standard and contrast-enhanced) are useful, safe, easyly applicable modalities for assessing the type and degree of vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma, and contrast-enhanced Doppler techniques show higher diagnostic value in differentiation of HCC lesions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleStandard and contrast-enhanced doppler sonography in assessment of the vascular pattern in hepatocellular carcinomaen_US
dc.title.alternativeСтандардната и контрастно-засилената доплер сонографија во проценката на васкуларниот приказ кај хепатоцелуларниот карциномen_US
dc.typeProceeding articleen_US
dc.relation.conferenceIX Macedonian congress of gastroenterology and hepatology with international participation = IX Македонски конгрес по гастроентерохепатологија со меѓународно учествоen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Conference papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
GASTRO KONGRES 2012 ORALNI PREZENTACII.jpg39.94 kBJPEGThumbnail
View/Open
2012 GENADIEVA DOPLER.pdf815.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

41
checked on Jul 24, 2024

Download(s)

19
checked on Jul 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.