Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/16961
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Deskoski, Toni | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dokovski, Vangel | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kocev, Ljuben | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-14T10:37:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-14T10:37:39Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Deskoski, T. Dokovski, V. Kocev, Lj. (2021). (De)localization of Arbitration - Online vs. Offline Arbitration - E-arbitration in time of Covid 19. Iustinianus Primus Law Review Vol 12. Issue 2. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/16961 | - |
dc.description.abstract | “We are living in unprecedented times” - a statement in all aspects of our lives for the past year. This is also valid for international commercial arbitration. Like never before COVID 19 is changing and reshaping the world of arbitration. From expensive places for arbitral hearings to online platforms, from in-person hearings to virtual hearings. The direct impact of the lack of universal lex arbitri can be observed in the field of online and offline arbitration. In this sense, the terms “online” and “offline” arbitration are used to demonstrate the difference between in-person and virtual conduct of the arbitration. Traditional arbitration is converting into e-arbitration. By doing so, many national legislators and arbitral institutions are modernizing their rules just to provide an appropriate framework for e-arbitration. However, some of the theoretical concepts are more vivid now than before. The detach of international arbitration as a concept in the arbitration theory once again is attracting the attention of many legal scholars. Adapt, improve, and overcome – is the new standard in international arbitration. And this standard needs to fit with the basic principle of international commercial arbitration – due process and right to be heard. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Faculty of Law Iustinianus Primus | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Iustinianus Primus Law Review | en_US |
dc.subject | e-arbitration, lex arbitri, delocalization, seat of arbitration. | en_US |
dc.title | (De)localization of Arbitration - Online vs. Offline Arbitration - E-arbitration in time of Covid 19 | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Faculty of Economics | - |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Economics 03: Journal Articles / Статии во научни списанија |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
10. Deskoski, Dokovski, Kocevdocx.pdf | 420.8 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
95
checked on Jul 24, 2024
Download(s)
155
checked on Jul 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.