Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/17597
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPejkova, Sofijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNikolovska, Biseraen_US
dc.contributor.authorSrbov, Blagojaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTusheva, Sofijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJovanoski, Tomislaven_US
dc.contributor.authorJovanovska, Katerinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorgieva, Gordanaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-10T07:58:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-10T07:58:06Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-22-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/17597-
dc.description.abstractRegenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) is a relatively new surgical technique to manage neuromas and phantom pain after limb amputation. This study evaluates prophylactic RPNI efficacy in managing post-amputation pain and neuroma formation in amputees compared with patients in which lower limb amputation was performed without this procedure. We included 28 patients who underwent above the knee amputation (AKA) or below the knee amputation (BKA) for severe soft tissue infection from July 2019 till December 2020. All patients had insulin-dependent diabetes. The patients were divided into two groups, 14 patients with primary RPNI and 14 patients without. We analyzed the demographic data, level of amputation, number of RPNIs, operative time, postoperative complications and functional outcome on the defined follow up period. The mean patient age was 68.6 years (range 49-85), 19 (67.9 %) male and 9 (32.1 %) female patients. In this study 11 (39.3 %) AKA and 17 (60.7 %) BKA were performed. Overall, 37 RPNIs were made. The mean follow-up period was 49 weeks. PROMIS T-score decreased by 15.9 points in favor for the patients with RPNI. The VAS score showed that, in the RPNI group, all 14 patients were without pain compared to the group of patients without RPNI, where the 11 (78.6 %) patients described their pain as severe. Patients with RPNI used prosthesis significantly more (p < 0.005). Data showed significant reduction in pain and high patient satisfaction after amputation with RPNIs. This technique is oriented as to prevent neuroma formation with RPNI surgery, performed at the time of amputation. RPNI surgery did not provoke complications or significant lengthening of operative time and it should be furthermore exploited as a surgical technique.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMacedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts / Walter de Gruyter GmbHen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPrilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)en_US
dc.subjectphantom Limb Painen_US
dc.subjectRPNIen_US
dc.subjectamputationen_US
dc.subjectneuromaen_US
dc.subjectprosthesisen_US
dc.titleProphylactic Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces in Elective Lower Limb Amputationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/prilozi-2022-0004-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/prilozi-2022-0004-
dc.identifier.volume43-
dc.identifier.issue1-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

46
checked on Jul 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.