Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/20742
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIgnovska Elenaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-12T10:05:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-12T10:05:34Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/20742-
dc.description.abstractIn May 2021 a young man aged 19, born and raised in the Republic of North Macedonia died unexpectedly under unknown health circumstances. Namely, he did not have health insurance, nor a general practitioner to follow his health because he was never issued a birth certificate. The news wrote that the only proof of his existence were excellent grades at school-which against all legal impediments allowed him to educate. For the rest of the legal society, the person never existed. One would ask why this happened. The administrative organs would “silently presuppose“ that the answer lies in the legal marital presumption of his mother’s husband from whom she was separated but not divorced at the time of his birth (even though they divorced afterwards), while she was living with another man (genetic father of the deceased man) in an extra-marital relationship. This administrative and legal nightmare is in line with the Family Act but against internationally ratified documents, such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child (art. 7 and 8), the European Convention of Human Rights (art. 8) and the practice of the European Court of Human Rights (e.g. Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 1994). Even more, it unveils one rigid and therefore ill functioning system. The text aims to emphasize that no matter how outdated national Family Act is (subject of another debate), national administrative and judicial organs should manifest flexible interpretation in light of the evolutionary concept of the law in the current time and context and through the prism of the specifics of each particular case. Family Act reforms are placed in the “waiting room“ for a prolonged period. Yet, families have to live with the consequences of an ignorant legislator and strict and positivistic interpretation of laws in their application by national institutions every day. Unfortunately, for some of them, like the boy who had waited for recognition for too long before he died, justice delayed is justice terminally denied.en_US
dc.publisherIustinianus Primus Law Reviewen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol 12, Issue 2;-
dc.subjectbirth certificate, marital presumption, recognition, rebutting fatherhood, family life.en_US
dc.titleMARITAL PRESUMPTION AS A LEGAL OBSTACLE FOR GAINING LEGAL STATUS OF CHILDREN LOST IN ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL LABYRINTHS IN NORTH MACEDONIA AND IN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS’ CASE-LAWen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Law: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Marital presumtion....pdf463.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on Jul 24, 2024

Download(s)

38
checked on Jul 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.