Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/23372
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Slamkov, Dejan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Stojanov, Venko | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Koteska, Bojana | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mishev, Anastas | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-12T06:13:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-12T06:13:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-10 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1613-0073 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/23372 | - |
dc.description.abstract | FAIR data principles represent a set of community-agreed guiding principles and practices for all researchers involved in the eScience ecosystem. The FAIR data principles were created to improve the reuse of data by making it findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. The goal of these principles is to ensure that the inputs and outputs from the computational analysis can be easily found and understood by data consumers, both humans, and machines. Since the introduction of FAIR Data Principles in 2016, the interest in these principles has been constantly increasing and several research groups have started developing tools for the evaluation of data FAIRness. In this paper, we aim to analyze the available online tools and checklists for data FAIRness evaluation and to provide tool comparison based on multiple features. Taking into account this analysis and the tools' advantages and disadvantages, we provide recommendations about the tools' usage. A FAIRness practical evaluation is also conducted on seven data sets from different data repositories using the analysed tools. Findings show that there are no commonly accepted requirements evaluation of data FAIRness. The conclusions of this study could be used for further improvement of the FAIRness criteria design and making FAIR feasible in daily practice. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | CEUR-WS.org | en_US |
dc.relation | National Initiatives for Open Science in Europe – NI4OS Europe | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 3237;15 | - |
dc.subject | Data FAIRness | en_US |
dc.subject | open science | en_US |
dc.subject | FAIR principles | en_US |
dc.title | A Comparison of Data FAIRness Evaluation Tools | en_US |
dc.type | Proceeding article | en_US |
dc.relation.conference | Ninth Workshop on Software Quality Analysis, Monitoring, Improvement, and Applications | en_US |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering | - |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering: Conference papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
paper-sla.pdf | 5.64 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
175
checked on Jul 24, 2024
Download(s)
76
checked on Jul 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.