Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/29514
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mucunski, Timcho; Klimovski, Aleksandar | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-25T18:53:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-25T18:53:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2367-7007 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/29514 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The three institutes which we will analyze in this paper are: societas, societas publicanorum and peculium. It is these institutes. which in the roman legal system were the primary organizational-status forms in trade relations. There is an abundant amount of theoretical and empirical analysis surrounding the issue of whether corporate type entities existed in Ancient Rome, the issue of an abundance of historical analysis is lacking. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Ius Romanum | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ius Romanum | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Ius Romanum I/2021 - Obligatio; | - |
dc.subject | Roman Law; trade relations; societas; societas publicanorum; peculium. | en_US |
dc.title | Societas, Societas Publicanorum and Peculium in the Context of Contemporary Corporate Entities | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Law: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
IUS_ROMANUM_OBLIGATIO_26_01_2022_OFF.pdf | 8.42 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
22
checked on Jul 11, 2024
Download(s)
3
checked on Jul 11, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.